“Well, there’s no sign that says not to make snow angels in
the barley.” I was in the Guiness
Brewery, one of Dublin’s kitschier tourist sites, looking at a huge vat of
dried barley, when I heard a woman (American) say this jokingly to her
boyfriend. Earlier that morning I had
walked by an open cathedral and into the courtyard, where I sat down on a
concrete slab only to read on the opposite wall that I was sitting on a
nineteenth century crypt.
Where in America would you be able to sit on anything that’s
it noteworthy to say you sat on? America’s a place where there’d definitely be
a sign to make it clear that it is prohibited to get within three feet of the
crypt, or to make snow angels in the barley.
I didn’t realize how much these totally reasonable, if
self-explanatory, regulatory elements of exhibits in the U.S. were impacting my
experience in museums until I began to notice their absence in Dublin. The “do not touch” signs, the burgundy
velvet ropes that hang in arcs, the lines of tape that show you how close you
shouldn’t get, they’re all dilutions that impact your ability to interface with
the object of attention without intervention.
It’s the equivalent of texting with what you’re seeing instead of having
an in-person conversation.
My girlfriend told me that in French, there’s a word for the
feeling when you get when you are standing at the edge of the sea and you feel
an improbable yet intense calling to start walking until you disappear beneath
the waves. Isn’t this feeling, this very
real possibility, what makes the ocean so majestic? And don’t you feel it less when
you’re looking at the ocean through the protective bars of a fence? And the
knowledge that, when sitting on a 300 year old crypt, you could theoretically
tag it with your girlfriend’s initials, or even bend over and lick it, that’s
part of the experience of authentically interfacing with it; your inherent
sense of respect stops you.
Of course, I’ve always thought of these precautions (the “do
not touch” signs, the roping off) as necessary – an anonymous curator or
historian or someone somewhere whose job it is to protect humanity from itself. But if it was so inevitable for humans to
violate anything sacred, wouldn’t there be evidence of such? Wouldn’t there be
snow angels in the barley?
It’s possible that Europeans raise their kids to be more
inherently respectful human beings, but I’ll reject that explanation simply
because it’s not very hopeful. My other theory comes from (surprise) the
classroom, a place where people tend to rise to the standards that you set for
them. Imply to students that you see
them as adults, treat them like their frontal lobe is fully developed, and
you’re often pleasantly surprised.
The trust that is extended to the public here in Ireland, the offering of an unadulterated connection with artifacts of the past, does not go
unappreciated. Perhaps the respect
received is passed on. Barley is
untouched, and crypts are only sat upon on by accident.
No comments:
Post a Comment